Objawy psychiatryczne i jakość życia u saudyjskich pacjentów z epilepsją leczonych perampanem: badanie porównawcze przekrojowe

PubMed➕ 09.07.2026Epilepsy Res

Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in Saudi individuals with epilepsy receiving perampanel: A cross-sectional comparative study

W skrócie

Badanie porównywało objawy depresji, lęku i inne zaburzenia psychiatryczne u pacjentów z epilepsją stosujących perampanel wobec grupy kontrolnej bez tego leku. Wyniki pokazały, że perampanel nie powodował wyraźnego pogorszenia zdrowia psychiatrycznego, ale wolniejsze zwiększanie dawki było związane z mniejszymi objawami depresji i lepszą jakością życia. Naukowcy zasugerowali, że powolne, ostrożne wprowadzanie leku i uważne łączenie go z innymi lekami na epilepsję mogą być ważne dla bezpieczeństwa pacjentów.

Oryginalny abstract (angielski)

BACKGROUND: Perampanel (PER) is a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist widely used in focal and generalized epilepsies. Although generally well tolerated, psychiatric side effects (PSEs) such as irritability, depression, and behavioral changes have been reported. Given the potential influence of genetic, cultural, and psychosocial factors on psychiatric vulnerability, this study aimed to describe psychiatric symptoms and health‑related quality of life in Saudi individuals with epilepsy treated with PER compared with controls not receiving PER, and to explore clinical factors associated with these outcomes. METHOD: This cross-sectional observational study included adults and adolescents with epilepsy recruited from two neurology clinics, between February 2023 - 2024, divided into those receiving PER and matched controls not treated with PER. Participants completed standardized psychiatric and quality‑of‑life assessments (GAD‑7, PHQ‑9, NDDI‑E, YMRS, and QOLIE‑31). Clinical variables, including PER dose, titration speed, and concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs), were examined for associations with psychiatric and QOLIE‑31 outcomes. RESULTS: Forty‑seven participants were included (23 PER‑treated; 24 controls). There were no statistically significant between‑group differences in anxiety, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, or quality‑of‑life scores on any scale. Within the PER‑treated group, slower titration was significantly correlated with lower depressive symptom burden on the NDDI‑E and with higher QOLIE‑31 scores for emotional well‑being, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Polytherapy with ASMs other than PER was moderately associated with greater seizure worry on the QOLIE‑31. CONCLUSION: In this small Saudi cohort, PER treatment was not associated with a demonstrable increase in psychiatric symptom burden compared with controls, whereas titration speed and polytherapy appeared related to mood and quality‑of‑life measures. These findings are exploratory and suggest that cautious, gradual titration and careful use of polytherapy may be important when initiating PER, but larger, adequately powered prospective studies incorporating seizure‑outcome and adverse‑event data are needed to further clarify its psychiatric safety profile.

Metadane publikacji

Journal
Epilepsy Res
Data publikacji
04.07.2026
PMID
42419141
DOI
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2026.107867
Autorzy
Abbas GM, Basheikh MA, Mousa MG, Alsharif JH, Jabbad AH, Tayeb OH, Nagadi KK, Tayeb HO, Abdulghaffar HK, Jabbad RH
Słowa kluczowe
Antiseizure medications, Epilepsy, Perampanel, Psychiatric adverse effects, Quality of life
Źródło
PubMed