Aceazolamid w leczeniu epilepsji opornej na leki: przegląd systematyczny z metaanalizą
Acetazolamide in drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis
W skrócie
Badanie pokazuje, że aceazolamid - stary lek na epilepsję - może być pomocny u pacjentów z epilepsją oporną na leki, u których inne leki nie działają. Lek pomógł w całkowitym zatrzymaniu napadów u około 26% pacjentów i zmniejszył napady o co najmniej połowę u 68% osób. Choć aceazolamid ma więcej efektów ubocznych niż nowsze leki, jego niski koszt i inny mechanizm działania sprawiają, że warto go rozważyć jako opcję u wybranych pacjentów, zwłaszcza z pewnymi szczególnymi rodzajami epilepsji.
Oryginalny abstract (angielski)
BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) remains a high-morbidity condition despite expanding antiseizure medications. Acetazolamide (ACZ), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor introduced for epilepsy in the 1950s, has been largely displaced by newer agents and concerns about tolerance, but its low cost and pH-mediated mechanism support reassessment in select DRE contexts. METHODS: We conducted a PROSPERO-registered, PRISMA-S-informed systematic review of clinical studies evaluating ACZ as mono- or adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant or refractory epilepsy through May 11, 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa and ROBINS-I frameworks. To quantify treatment efficacy random-effects generalized linear mixed-model meta-analyses estimated seizure freedom and ≥50% responder rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. The pooled seizure-freedom proportion was 25.7% (95% CI, 15.8%-38.9%; k = 20; I² = 89.5%) and ≥50% responder proportion 67.5% (95% CI, 48.2%-82.2%; k = 26; I² = 96.7%). Leave-one-out analysis did not identify a single influential study nor did exploratory meta-regression show a significant age-response correlation. Phenotype-specific and narrative findings demonstrated more consistent response in certain catamenial, spike-wave, photosensitive, genetic, and metabolic epilepsy contexts. Metabolic acidosis, nephrolithiasis, and treatment discontinuation were comparatively uncommon, whereas adverse effects were predominantly tolerability-related. CONCLUSION: ACZ retains a measurable but selective antiseizure signal in DRE. However, limitations in decades-old reporting, considerable between-study heterogeneity, limited controlled clinical evidence, and modest sample sizes in phenotype-specific cohorts require researchers to interpret the evidence with caution. Nevertheless, ACZ's observed clinical activity, low cost, and distinct mechanism of action make it a promising candidate for prospective studies to identify responsive epilepsy types, assess the durability of benefit, and redefine its place in modern epilepsy care.