Przydatność testów przesiewowych do rozpoznawania bezdechu senne u dorosłych pacjentów z epilepsją

PubMed➕ 24.09.2026Epilepsy Behav

Performance characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea screening instruments in adults with epilepsy

W skrócie

Badacze zbadali, jak dobrze działają różne proste testy służące do szybkiego rozpoznawania bezdechu sennego u dorosłych z epilepsją. Okazało się, że najpopularniejsze testy, takie jak STOP-BANG, mogą wykryć bezdech senny, ale nie są wystarczająco dokładne i mogą pominąć wiele przypadków choroby. Lepsze wyniki dają nowsze wersje testów, jednak nawet one mają ograniczoną przydatność i potrzebne jest pełne badanie snu do postawienia pewnego rozpoznania.

Oryginalny abstract (angielski)

RATIONALE: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent, but often overlooked comorbidity in adults with epilepsy (AWE). Screening instruments widely used in general populations include STOP (Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apneas, high blood Pressure) and STOP-BANG (+BMI, Age, Neck circumference (NC), and Gender). Novel screens such as STOP-BAG may improve OSA risk stratification, but validity and performance characteristics of OSA instruments have not been studied in large AWE populations. METHODS: We analyzed 724 AWE with STOP-BANG data available within 1 year of polysomnography (PSG). The primary outcome was apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5. We compared STOP, STOP-BANG, STOP-BAG, STOP-BAG, and reweighted STOP-BANG. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated. Instrument performance was compared by differences in AUC, with optimal cutoffs identified by the Youden index and internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Seizure severity and frequency were assessed with the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale. RESULTS: Higher STOP, STOP-BANG, STOP-BAG, and STOP-BAG scores were associated with AHI ≥ 5. STOP-BANG, STOP-BAG, STOP-BAG, and STOP-BANG were superior to STOP. STOP-BAG and STOP-BANG showed the strongest predictive power, each with an AUC of 0.70. At the Youden cutoff, STOP-BAG yielded 67 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity, while STOP-BANG yielded 72 % sensitivity and 60 % specificity. STOP-BAG was superior to STOP-BANG and STOP-BAG (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively) and did not differ from STOP-BANG (p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: STOP-derived instruments showed limited-to-moderate discrimination for PSG-defined OSA. The continuous weighted models had the highest AUCs, but the gain over categorical scores was modest, and their selected cutoffs would miss a clinically relevant portion of OSA cases.

Metadane publikacji

Journal
Epilepsy Behav
Data publikacji
22.09.2026
PMID
42777551
DOI
10.1016/j.yebeh.2026.111310
Autorzy
El Ahdab J, Bare T, Araujo ML, Bena J, Ryan D, Grigg-Damberger M, Foldvary-Schaefer N
Słowa kluczowe
Adults with epilepsy, Apnea-hypopnea index, Epilepsy, Obstructive sleep apnea, Polysomnography, STOP-BAG(2), STOP-BANG, Screening instruments
Źródło
PubMed