Długotrwałe stosowanie i przerwanie leczenia eslicarbazepinem - znaczenie pierwszych trzech miesięcy w ogniskowej epilepsji

PubMed➕ 11.09.2026Clin Neurol Neurosurg

Time-dependent retention and discontinuation of eslicarbazepine acetate treatment in real-world focal epilepsy: The first three months as a key period

W skrócie

Badanie pokazuje, że lek eslicarbazepina (ESL) jest używany w leczeniu epilepsji ogniskowej, ale około 40% pacjentów przerywa leczenie, głównie w pierwszych trzech miesiącach, najczęściej z powodu skutków ubocznych. Pierwsze trzy miesiące są kluczowym okresem, w którym trzeba uważnie monitorować pacjenta i rozważyć, jakie inne leki przeciwpadaczkowe są stosowane jednocześnie, ponieważ niektóre kombinacje mogą zwiększać ryzyko skutków ubocznych i przerwania leczenia.

Oryginalny abstract (angielski)

PURPOSE: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a widely used anti-seizure medication (ASM), used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for patients with focal epilepsy, including drug-resistant epilepsy. Detailed analyses of factors associated with treatment outcomes are limited; therefore, this study evaluated 12-month retention, responder, and seizure freedom rates, focusing on time-specific associated baseline characteristics. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, observational study included patients (≥19 years) with focal epilepsy who initiated ESL treatment from November 2022 to December 2024. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by retention, responder (≥50% seizure reduction compared with baseline) and seizure freedom rate at 3, 6, and 12 months. Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events reported by patients. RESULTS: In 12-month analysis cohort (n = 180; mean age 48.5 ± 15.9 years; 50.6% men), the retention rate was 69.4%. Of 210 patients initiating ESL, 85 (40.5%) had non-retention or unavailable follow-up; 62 cases (72.9%) occurred within first 3 months. Adverse events were most common. A higher retention rate was associated with epileptiform discharge on electroencephalogram, whereas a lower retention rate was associated with baseline seizure frequency. Most reported adverse events occurred within 3 months of ESL initiation (74.4%). More adverse events were associated with concomitant ASM use, particularly lacosamide and lamotrigine. The five most common adverse events were constant at 3, 6, and 12 months. CONCLUSION: The first 3 months are a key period for optimizing treatment retention and minimizing adverse events. Careful consideration of concomitant ASM is required, as concomitant ASM may be associated with lower retention and more adverse events, particularly sodium channel blockers.

Metadane publikacji

Journal
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Data publikacji
01.09.2026
PMID
42721612
DOI
10.1016/j.clineuro.2026.109632
Autorzy
Park J, Winter Y, Koo YS
Słowa kluczowe
Adverse events, Concomitant anti-seizure medication, Eslicarbazepine acetate, Retention rate, Sodium channel blocker, Time-dependent
Źródło
PubMed