Cenobamatu poprawia regulację emocji, impulsywność i apatię u pacjentów z oporną na leki ogniskową epilepsją - badanie neuropsychologiczne
PubMed➕ 09.09.2026Neurol Ther
Cenobamate Improves Emotional Dysregulation, Impulsivity, and Apathy in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Longitudinal Neuropsychological Study
W skrócie
Badanie wykazało, że lek cenobamatu podawany pacjentom z trudną do leczenia epilepsją ogniskową powoduje znaczną poprawę w regulacji emocji, zmniejszenie impulsywności i apatii, a także poprawę pamięci. U pacjentów w badaniu aż 74 procent pozytywnie odpowiadało na leczenie, a 30 procent całkowicie wyeliminowało napady. Poprawa w nastroju i funkcjonowaniu pacjentów była niezależna od tego, czy zmniejszyły się napady padaczkowe, co sugeruje dodatkowe korzystne efekty samego leku poza kontrolą napadów.
Oryginalny abstract (angielski)
INTRODUCTION: Although effects on cognitive function have been reported during cenobamate (CNB) treatment, far less is known about how it may affect neuropsychological domains such as apathy, emotion dysregulation, and impulsivity. This prospective longitudinal study aims to assess psychopathological and cognitive changes after CNB introduction in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, accounting for seizure outcome and burden of concomitant anti-seizure medication (ASM). METHODS: We consecutively recruited adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who had undergone a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at baseline, before starting CNB, and at follow-up, 12 months after treatment introduction. The psychopathological battery included Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-36), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QoLIE-31). The cognitive assessment comprised Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Digit-Span, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, WEIGL, FAS, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). We applied linear mixed-effects models adjusted for responder status and total concomitant ASM defined daily dose (DDD) ratio. RESULTS: Our cohort included 27 individuals (16 female; mean age 42.4 ± 16.7 years) showing a 74% responder rate with 30% achieved seizure freedom at follow-up. CNB treatment was associated with favorable changes in BDI-II (q = 0.009), DERS-36 (q = 2.36 × 10), BIS-11 (q = 6.30 × 10), AES (q = 4.87 × 10), and QoLIE-31 (q = 0.009). RAVLT-Immediate performance likewise improved (q = 0.004), whereas SDMT worsened over time (q = 0.002); the remaining domains were unchanged. These effects remained significant after adjustment for responder status and total concomitant ASM DDD ratio: BDI-II [β (95% CI) = - 0.582 (- 0.943, - 0.221)], DERS-36 [β (95% CI) = - 0.550 (- 0.739, - 0.361)], BIS-11 [β (95% CI) = - 0.932 (- 1.144, - 0.719)], AES [β (95% CI) = - 1.001 (- 1.330, - 0.673)], QoLIE-31 [β (95% CI) = 0.488 (0.185, 0.791)], RAVLT-Immediate performance [β (95% CI) = 0.446 (0.255, 0.636)], and SDMT [β (95% CI) = - 0.294 (- 0.425, - 0.163)]. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive CNB was correlated with psychopathological improvements alongside domain-specific cognitive changes, independent of seizure outcome and concomitant ASM burden. These findings further expand current knowledge on CNB impact and tolerability profile.
Metadane publikacji
Journal
Neurol Ther
Data publikacji
08.09.2026
PMID
42711635
DOI
10.1007/s40120-026-01022-x
Autorzy
Sammarra I, Saraceno A, Martino I, Vono A, Operto FF, Fortunato F, Gambardella A