Błędy interpretacyjne u pacjentów z epilepsją: różnice między epilepsją uogólnioną genetyczną, epilepsją skroniową i osobami zdrowymi

BACKGROUND: Attributional bias, a tendency to overinterpret others' intentions as hostile (rather than situational or accidental), represents a component of social cognition and may affect everyday functioning. Neural models link attributional processing to fronto-temporal circuits and the default mode network, which are frequently altered in epilepsy. Difficulties in social participation and employment are common in people with epilepsy, and maladaptive attributional styles may contribute to these challenges. Attributional bias has not been systematically compared across epilepsy syndromes. METHODS: We examined attributional bias in 96 participants comprising 26 individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy (GGE), 27 with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 43 healthy controls (HC). Attributional style was assessed using the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy. Group differences were analysed, and potential clinical and demographical correlates were explored. RESULTS: The GGE group exhibited higher hostility bias scores than HC (95% CI: 0.12-0.38, adjusted p = 0.014), whereas the difference between TLE and HC groups was moderate and not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.12-0.58, adjusted p = 0.059). Higher blame scores were positively associated with depressive symptoms (p = 0.016). Disease duration, seizure frequency, and antiseizure medication were not significantly associated with attributional bias. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that some individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy are more likely to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile. Altered attributional style may represent an under-recognised factor contributing to social difficulties in people with epilepsy and warrants further investigation as a potential target for psychosocial interventions.